PR EDA : 572-335-4994
Answering this question varies significantly based on the specific circumstances of each case; however, many legal matters can be settled faster by both sides being willing to negotiate and compromise.
If informal negotiations do not produce an equitable settlement offer, your Long Island personal injury lawyer will file a formal lawsuit in court with an official complaint that details your claim and what type of relief is desired.
An important first step in any civil lawsuit is filing a complaint to detail the dispute and seek specific remedies. In such a lawsuit, the plaintiff outlines how their actions caused injury or harm and provides legal grounds for holding them responsible.
Answers must be filed formally by defendants to the plaintiff’s claim in order to present defenses or counterclaims against his causes of action.
Due to court schedules and complexity of cases, this phase can often take more time than anticipated for resolution. If all parties can come together on an acceptable solution quickly and agreeable to all terms, this timeline can be reduced significantly.
Trial is the most costly and time-consuming stage of civil lawsuit proceedings. Although most cases settle prior to reaching trial, which shortens its length substantially; nevertheless, it could still take months or years before completion.
Litigating can be a lengthy process and may involve court scheduling, legal motions and ongoing settlement talks; however there are steps you can take to accelerate it and move towards resolution faster.
One effective way to shorten the duration of your case is through alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation. Mediation encourages cooperation among parties involved, helping them find mutually beneficial and cost-efficient solutions for their issues.
At this phase, disputants gather in an exclusive environment in order to freely express their viewpoints on a matter. A mediator then opens the session by introducing everyone and detailing how mediation will go forward. He or she then facilitates a joint discussion where each party can describe their situation as well as any associated interests and concerns; depending on its complexity, mediators may transition into separate meetings known as caucuses for further discussions.
If settlement negotiations and mediation efforts do not succeed, the case will progress into its trial stage, which may last from several months up to several years depending on its complexity and court schedules.
At this point, parties exchange essential documents and conduct depositions or interrogatories in order to build their cases. This process may be lengthy in contested cases where witnesses must provide sworn testimony; alternatively, motions may be filed in order to settle prior to trial using summary judgment.
Trial proceedings typically last anywhere from several days to several months and involve attorneys presenting opening statements, calling witnesses, cross-examining them and making legal arguments before being presented before a jury for deliberation and subsequent judgement by a judge. After which either side may choose to appeal the verdict further prolonging litigation; hence it is usually wiser to try to reach an agreement during trial if possible.
The Appeal Phase is an effective strategy that can change the outcome of a legal dispute following court ruling. At this point, specific procedures need to be followed in order for your appeal to be successful, so if this option interests you it would be prudent to consult an experienced personal injury attorney prior to taking this route.
First step of appealing is filing a notice with the appropriate court within an allotted timeframe and collecting all documents, transcripts and evidence used in original trial trial for review on appeal.
At this phase, the party appealing will present their legal arguments to a panel of judges via a brief. In essence, an appellant’s purpose will be to convince them that the lower court made an error in its ruling; on the other side however, an appellee (ie appellee) attempts to show why its ruling was correct and any errors didn’t significantly alter the result of their case.